Friday, February 27, 2015

An interesting and often overlooked aspect of the child welfare system is the cultural aspect. How are children from culturally rich backgrounds treated and taught? One way in which the law recognizes culture is with the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. This law protects the interest of Native American families and tribal interest in their children. It mandates that Native American children placed in foster care must be placed in a member of the child’s extended family, a foster home approved by the child’s tribe, a Native American foster home, or an institution for children approved by the tribe. As each tribe has unique customs, so do they require unique boundaries in regard to this law. Historically, the United States government has forced a tremendous amount of cultural genocide on Native American people in forms of land seizure, boarding schools, and many other offenses. This law attempts to protect the future of Native American tribes. While I wholeheartedly agree with this law and its motives, I have seen some problems attached to it. I worked with a Native American child, an Eeyore with two siblings, since I began volunteering at Casa de los NiƱos. They lived at the shelter for at least five months, much longer than the 21 day maximum goal, because there were no available foster parents or adoptive parents from their tribe. Eventually, the court overruled the law and allowed all three siblings to be adopted by a non-tribal family. I understand the importance of this law and the historical precedent, but I feel morally uncertain when this particular situation occurs. Is the preservation of culture a significant enough cause to warrant a detriment to a child’s development?

Sources:


1 comment:

  1. I think you have come upon the classical conundrum: how do we choose between the lesser of two evils? Maintaining cultural (tribal) integrity is clearly a worthy goal, but if no qualified foster parents can be found from among the tribe (a far too common problem, I suspect), the authorities must look elsewhere. Too many tribes are too small to provide demographic critical mass, and too many tribes have too many systemic problems -- underemployment, alcohol & substance abuse, single-parent families, etc. It's just sad, and I give you credit for working for an organization that is attempting to ameliorate some of these problems.

    ReplyDelete